May 26, 2026

I was introduced to handwriting by a one-armed woman who, upset that Raymond Crampton had bitten off the end of his pen, took matters into the one hand she had and pinned Raymond to the floor.
It was a pivotal moment in my education.
I’m not sure how they do it now but, when I was in school, learning to write was a measured process. It began in first and second grade when we were taught to print, in third grade when we learned the elusive art of cursive, and finally in sixth grade when, at least the boys, were introduced to the precise lettering required in draftsmanship. My handwriting…back when my hands still wrote… was an odd amalgamation of all three.
If you pull up the Michael J. Fox Parkinson’s Foundation website and look for the “Ten Early Signs” that you too might be a Promising Parky, No. 2 on that list is “Small Handwriting.” The neuro nerds call this “micrographia.”
“Big wup,” you might say. “I don’t know Rob, but I’m pretty sure you Parkies don’t have the corner on crummy handwriting. What, with lousy vision, arthritis in our hands, gnarled fingers…yada, yada, yada… old fart penmanship ain’t exactly what it once was.”
True enough.
But we Parkies have an added feature: our words get smaller and smaller over time, and we tend to clump them together. The not so long and very short of it is that our letters are shrinking and, more and more, there’s no space in our spaces.
Let me show you.
This was my signature on my 12th birthday. I know that because this is a copy of my signature taken from my original Social Security Card.

I remember going to the Social Security Office behind Coddingtown and mom telling me to sign with “my very best penmanship.” If you look closely, you can see nerves peeking through.
No foreshadowing there.
Now, this was my signature when I was sixty-years-old. I copied it from a court pleading I filed in June of 2016.

Some of the changes were laziness. More were the stuff of arrogance. The “R” and “J” do seem more than a bit pretentious, but in fairness to myself I do remember patterning the “J” after the signature of a judge with whom I clerked, whose kind demeanor I much admired, and who swore me in after I passed the Bar.
The long legged “R” I have no defense for.
Just this morning, I took my nifty Apple Pencil Pro to my nifty iPad Air and, for consistency, tried to sign my name in the same size and with the same speed as I might have signed a check with a Parker Jotter Pen, back when we wrote more than just two checks a year to folks other than the County Property Tax Collector.
This is my signature now.

See that?
That, my friends, is the power of what we in the courtroom biz used to call “demonstrative evidence.” A picture is worth a thousand words. Or, as in this case, 17 very small indecipherable letters.
“What about…Raymond?” you ask. “The one-armed lady?
Oh sorry. That’s right.
My 3rd Grade teacher, Miss Church, was a short, sweet, grandmotherly type who might have been the twin sister of Mary See of See’s Candy. A saint of a woman, she was always patient, soft spoken and, with one brief, but notable exception, was affectionate toward all children. (I don’t mind saying that, judging by the frequency with which I was asked to clean the erasers, she was particularly fond of me.)
Now the thing about Miss Church was…how to put this?
It doesn’t seem a polite or sensitive term…there must be some medical or anatomical way to describe it…but I’m just going to go ahead and say it because that’s how it appeared to us 3rd graders…
Miss Church had a stump for a left arm.
As you can imagine, this was shocking the first day of school, but by Christmas, as we watched her hold a book beneath her upper arm, or help us on with our winter coat, or push a swing, or let the ball fly in dodge ball, we never saw her one wingedness as a disability.
What was particularly impressive was Miss Church’s penmanship. Third Grade curriculum called for a dicey matriculation from simple printing with a Ticonderoga No. 2 pencil to cursive writing with a ball point pen. This was a daunting change.
For starters, the letters were different. A capital Q, for example, looked more like the number “2” than the “O-with-a-tail” to which I had grown accustomed. The small case “g” was virtually indistinguishable from a small case “j” or “z”, and every time I tried to draw an upper case “S” it came out more closely resembling a treble clef for sheet music.
And the lower case “r”? Hell, it didn’t look at all like an “r.”

Then there was the fact that the damn letters attached to each other through some mysterious connections. Tell me again how the capital “D” in the chart above is supposed to connect to a lower case “e.”
I dare ya.
All of this was bad enough, but before you could draw these new and unusual letters, you had to learn how to hold your pen.
I was taught to rest the pen on the left side of my middle finger, just to the side of the furthermost knuckle, place the pad of my forefinger with slight pressure against the far edge, and place the pad of my thumb a ½” back and up the pen. This was preferred over those unfortunate souls who were taught to pinch the end of the pen with two fingers and the thumb and were thus forever damned to suffer from early onset writer’s cramp.
To help program the proper muscle memory, the Calhoun County Office of Education supplied each student with a “training pen.” This was a long blue ball point pen with a “grip” configuration at the head of the pen which forced your fingers into proper position. It was an elegant writing instrument which cost the County, we were told, a king’s ransom.

Walking up and down the rows of desks, Miss Church ceremoniously handed each student his or her pen, impressing on us the expense the school system had graciously gone to and the care with which we should treat them. As she returned to the front of the room, her back to us, she concluded by saying,
“UNDER ABSOLUTELY NO CIRCUMSTANCES ARE YOU TO CHEW ON YOUR PEN OR PLACE IT IN YOUR MOUTH.”
At that exact moment, a loud crack echoed from the back of the classroom. Everyone immediately turned in their chairs to see Raymond Crampton, the County Sheriff’s son, snap off the end of his Calhoun County pen in his mouth. This did not amuse Miss Church and she became even more incensed when Raymond, rather that wilting under her glare, erupted in a giant smile. He looked like an eight-year-old FDR with his cigarette holder pointed skyward to the heavens.
Now Raymond was no small kid and was generally regarded as the schoolyard bully most likely to wind up in his own dad’s jail. So, it was even more impressive when Miss Church summoned him, strutting and swaggering, to the front of the classroom and with her one good arm first took the pen from his mouth, swept him off his feet, took him to the floor, and then pinned him beneath one knee.
This had the desired effect on both Raymond and the class. He returned to his seat, chastened, with a short pen. The class? Well, we slowly retrieved our lower jaws from the linoleum floor and gingerly cradled our still lengthy pens.
I know. I know.
Some of you will find nothing to admire in Miss Church’s actions. I certainly don’t mean to condone corporal punishment and, thankfully, we have progressed from days when teachers would frighten and strike children.
I don’t know.
Maybe it was his attitude. Maybe her disability. Maybe it was the times. Maybe I just liked cleaning the erasers. Maybe then, as now, I loved a story where the bad guy, overestimating the strength of his position and underestimating the resolve of his adversary, gets his “comeuppance.” But, rightly or wrongly, I’ve never, even as an adult, faulted Miss Church. Yes, Raymond was an eight-year-old boy, but he was being a little prick, was challenging her authority, and was disrespectful to a disabled person.
You just don’t do that. Not to Miss Church.
A few years passed. We moved from Michigan to Pennsylvania. And I found myself in sixth grade at Woodland Avenue Junior High. Now, your junior high in Springfield Township consisted of 6th, 7th, and 8th Grades and the good folks at the Township’s Office of Education decided boys should be well grounded in what were known then as the “Industrial Arts.” These included woodshop, metal shop, and mechanical drawing.

I loved drafting. This was long before the advent of computers and CAD programs. Each boy would be seated at a drafting table, issued a mechanical pencil, a sliding T square, a triangle, and large sheets of vellum drafting paper.

The first lesson in Sixth Grade was to properly affix your paper to the board so that when the T square ran along the left edge of your board a line struck along its edge would be perfectly horizontal and a line struck along your 90° triangle would be perfectly vertical. Each drawing was labeled in the lower right-hand corner with the date, the scale, revision, and date. And it was in this lower right corner that we learned the advanced art of architectural printing.

Precision in printing was paramount. All cursive curls and swirls were jettisoned. Capital letters, and only capital letters, must be written in a very prescribed manner, each stroke in proper sequence and direction, the top and bottom of the letter touching the sides of an imaginary box.

This precision appealed to me. It required patience, concentration, discipline and the fine motor skill and a steady hand that we take for granted when we are young and long for when we are old. Expectations were clear; accomplishment guaranteed with application and effort.
Physicists tell us that time, while it appears to run from past to present to future, doesn’t really. There is no passage of time; time is just a series of discreet “nows.”
We perceive a differentiation between the past we know and can define and the future which we do not know and cannot define because of entropy. Ever since the “Big Bang”—the beginning of time and space as we now know it—time appears to “flow” in one direction because all things—schools, people, penmanship—are with each succeeding “now” slightly more disordered.
Dusty erasers don’t clean themselves. Pens, once broken, stay broken. Handwriting, once tentative, then precise, then bold and arrogant, reverts to tentative, then back to illegible and eventually becomes so small as to scarcely be seen.
All things tend toward a lessened state of order and a heightened state of disorder. This isn’t a sad or frightening or depressing realization. At least it shouldn’t be. It is what it is, what it always has been and what it always was to be.
We haven’t been misled. It’s all there in the fine print.



































































